I have told you that the research of the French doctors shows us that the extra-cellular fluid in the meridians flows always from the periphery to towards the heart. That goes against TCM theory of Qi flow in the meridians. But what are we defining as the Qi in the meridians?Is is the extracellular fluid itself (the quality of the fluid)? Is it the flow of the extracellular fluid? Or is it something else? And if so what? We know that charge is associated with the flow and that the charge follows a diurnal cycle. So you could say that the direction of flow is associated with whether the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system is in dominance. That is the only way I have thought of that can correlate with TCM theory. But that doesn’t really correlate with flow of any kind directly. Flow must be associated with the extracellular fluid. That is the only thing that makes sense to me. Besides, TCM theory also states that the qi of the meridians moistens and nourishes the tissues. That implies that the qi of the channels is associated with the circulation of extracellular fluid after all. . We can understand why the Chinese got that wrong. But now we know better. And knowing this we can design new treatments, which I have done and they work! Further validating my views. Try them for yourself. Then maybe you will accept what I claim. And if you have any objections to anything, give me the science where I am wrong. I have simply taken advantage of research done by others. If you want to know more, read their books. I have lots of ideas for useful research but no money, so I focus myself on new treatments which I can do. So far, most but not all of them have worked.